Napster From the publics point of view we think Napster should be able to participate a service to the public that lets us copy unanimity for free. Unlike mp3.com, Napster doesn?t profit from offering this service to the public. In mp3.com?s case, by making us pay a fee mp3.com in return should also pay a fee to the licensed owner of the medicinal drug. We feel that this would be dependable to us and to the genius companies. The go in companies should also start out a share of the profits. If Internet companies are profiting from the practice of medicine thus the owners of the music and the bands should also profit too.
< br/> The bands should get royalty checks from the record companies ground on the percentage of the fees and how many times their music has been downloaded. The record companies are being denied their share of the profits from this new-sprung(prenominal) music phenomenon. Just because something is on the Internet doesn?t loose ignoring the rules and regulations that a land based company have to follow. This thought process of of...If you motive to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay