Sophocles' 'Oedipus The King' - Was Oedipus a victim of hubris or a victim of the gods?

The mess of Oedipus was bitter indeed. By the end of Oedipus the King, he and his designate are elaten as Luckless (Ln 1195) and objects to envy non at either (Ln 1196). But what was it that caused this gentleman to sleep with his mother and throw his experience? What was it that Oedipus fell victim to? Was it the hubris that faceed to so permeate his parting? Was he a puppet held in the cruel becharm of the gods? It would seem that perhaps it was neither of these and that rather these things combined unitedly as Oedipus fell victim to chance. If the fate of Oedipus was a penalty thence it was a great whiz and therefore inhering know been caused by a large sin. The largest sin we see in the play is obviously parricide and incest, which Dodds claims were the greatest a man potbelly commit (Dodds). But this can not be what he was punished for as it was his punishment. The two can not be the same. Therefore another sin must be searched for and the one most commonly b lamed is his hubris. The hubris of Oedipus is most homely in his dealings with Creon and the contrast that is later drawn surrounded by his own actions and those of Creon. Oedipus is certain that Creon has betrayed him and lied to him.

He ignores the innocent mans protests and he sentences Creon to death saying No, certainly; kill you, not discharge you. (Ln 625) This was a terrible thing to do, a decision sterilize rashly, a decision made with much hubris. The point is forceful all the more sharply when Creon later says, ...when I cast off knowledge I prefer not to speak at random. (Ln 1546) A strong contras t is drawn between the... ! If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay